The power of imaginative play

Vygotsky theory of play

Vygotsky was a Russian psychologist. If you have watched my videos on Vygotsky’s theory, where I compare Vygotsky to Piaget, or when I unpack Vygotsky’s theory in more depth, you’d probably know that Vygotsky’s social-cultural theory, also called the cultural-historical perspective, values play a lot!

The features of pretend play

According to Vygotsky, pretend play has three features.

Number one, children create an imaginary situation. As he says, the child pretends as if this stick is a horse or as if this block is a phone.

Two: they take on this situation and then act out roles. They usually assign these roles to each other. For example, they might say, “I am going to be a policeman, you are going to be someone who is running away”, or “I am going to be a cat and you are going to be a mum at home.”

Three: They follow the rules they have created, and usually these rules come from the social and cultural context of the roles. The imaginary situation allows children to engage in a pretend rather than a real world.

Honestly, my niece really lives there. She loves pretending. She is at that stage. She is eight years old, and the wondrous world of imagination is really mesmerising. I watched her a lot this summer. In this world, in pretend play, an object can be separated from its meaning. Object substitutions are possible, reflecting an important element of cognitive development (Smolucha & Smolucha, 2021).

Children enact roles in play, and they show emotions associated with these roles. For example, if a baby is your role in play, you might cry or crawl after your peers and the “mum” and other people who are involved. Pretend play is a context where children can explore and express a lot of emotions. I have seen this — from fear to reasoning, from frustration to being very happy. This is an important step in emotional regulation.

Imaginative play is very important!

While children engage in pretend play freely, for more than 20 minutes or even one, two, or three hours, and create their own rules connected to their roles, they are developing, according to Vygotsky. They are learning within their zone of proximal development.

To sum up, I recognise play as an important process. The EYLF states that it is play-based and it is part of our curriculum framework, but quite often, people do not understand that to develop scenarios and roles, children need time. As an early childhood educator and teacher, I advocate for opportunities for children to discover, create, improvise and imagine. This should be supported by intentional actions of educators, which means they must have time and space for it.

What do you think about imaginative play?

Nature based teaching strategies

🌿 What If the Forest Was Your Classroom? 🌿

Imagine if the best teaching strategy wasn’t in a book… but beneath your feet, rustling in the leaves, buzzing in the air, and whispered by a curious child asking “Why do worms wiggle?”

At Storykate, I believe learning comes alive when we slow down, listen deeply, and reconnect with the world around us.

That’s why O love these powerful teaching and learning strategies inspired by nature pedagogy and thought leaders like Carson, Moss, Rautio, and Pelo. From walking with children (Malone, 2019) to attuning with animal kin (Young & Bone, 2020), these approaches invite us to teach with the land—not just on it.

✨ Some of our favourites:

  • Observation of Nature – Rachel Carson taught us to see wonder in the smallest things.
  • Slow Play – Honour the rhythm of childhood.
  • Sensing Ecologically – What if we taught through sound, smell, and soil?
  • Collective Inquiry – Learning is more powerful when it’s shared.
  • Oral Storytelling – Our first teaching method, and still one of the most powerful.

These aren’t just strategies. They’re invitations to be more present, more playful, and more purposeful in how we teach.

💬 Which one speaks to you today? Tell me in the comments.

Why do we need intentional teaching in early childhood education and care?

Do you know how Storykate is a big fan of socio-cultural theory by Lev Vygotsky?

I’ll give you an example of why I believe that scaffolding and teaching cultural tools are important in my philosophy as well.

I like Vygotsky not because he was a Soviet psychologist but because he provided us with his framework that still works, so according to social-cultural theory, social interaction and cultural transmission are important sources of knowledge.

When I was at university, we were given an example of how young street vendors in Brazil learn to count really well while selling goods, and these children did not go to school.

Is it a proposition not to go to school?

Does it mean that mathematical skills can be learned through observations or practice? Yes, and no!👩‍🎓

Hear me out!

The researchers were quite interested in the skills of the street vendors; they could easily perform simple arithmetic with 98% accuracy while buying and selling, including 2 and 3-digit numbers. They did addition and subtraction fast and well. When they were asked to write it down or understand arithmetic with mathematical notation, in other words, written down, they didn’t fail exactly, but their accuracy dropped to 37%. I like this example! Australian school children can perform the following two problems, and solve them. A boy wants to buy three chocolates that cost 50 coins each. How much money does he need? And the second problem is, ‘Another boy wants to buy 50 chocolates, this costs three coins each. How much money does he need?’

You can replace coins with cents or whatever currency you are using; if you think about it, it’s just a very simple problem from the point of an adult learner.

School children solve the problems with multiplication: 3×50 and were able to solve the second problem really well because they knew and understood that 3×50 = 50×3; they knew equations. In contrast, the children from the streets, the young street vendors from Brazil, were not able to use this fast method, so they used addition in both cases.

It means that teaching explicitly through scaffolding is what we have teachers for, including preschool teachers. Teachers help to move fast, solve problems more effectively, and learn cultural tools through interaction. Children at school learn how to do the equations and how to do multiplication because they went to school. Children should talk about how they solve the problem because they learn by reasoning. According to Vygotsky, the teacher also scaffolds this type of learning by modelling, providing prompts, and practicing. What about vendors? They learn it through practice, which is a wonderful way to learn as well, according to modern scientists like Marilyn Fleer, who is also a supporter of social-cultural theory. Concepts can be better introduced even at the preschool level if you are intentional.

Scaffolding is an important teaching strategy and we MUST use it in addition to play or self-paced learning.

WHAT DO YOU THINK, EDUCATORS?