

Liked the handout? Make it yours, along with hundreds of other pages on theories https://payhip.com/b/Z9a2T
Storykate
Storykate: Early Childhood Teacher Australia
Helping educators create engaging curriclum with puppets, stories, mind maps and music


Liked the handout? Make it yours, along with hundreds of other pages on theories https://payhip.com/b/Z9a2T
Storykate

I paused for a second because it was the first time I had heard that term. Naturally, I asked a few more questions.
UNSCHOOLING
It turns out that unschooling is an educational approach in which children learn through their own interests, curiosity, and everyday experiences rather than pursuing a fixed curriculum or formal lessons. Instead of adults deciding exactly what and when children should learn, the childโs interests help guide the learning process.
For example, a child interested in cooking might naturally explore maths through measuring ingredients. They can develop literacy through reading recipes. They may also learn science through experimenting with food.
I found the conversation really interesting because the idea of self-directed learning is becoming more visible in conversations about education and childhood.
RESEARCH
Wheatley (2009) describes unschooling as a child-led approach to education. Learning develops naturally through childrenโs interests, play, and curiosity. It is also nurtured by everyday experiences instead of a formal curriculum. This approach avoids tests or teacher-directed instruction. The article argues that children are naturally motivated to learn when their emotional and developmental needs are met. Wheatley draws on theories of intrinsic motivation and self-determination. He suggests that traditional schooling can undermine childrenโs love of learning. This happens when schools rely too heavily on control, standardisation, and external rewards.
The article highlights several perceived benefits of unschooling. These benefits include greater individualisation of learning. There are more opportunities for creativity and initiative. The approach allows flexible use of time. It also offers stronger support for the “whole child,” including social, emotional, and physical wellbeing. Wheatley also argues that unschooling encourages democratic participation. Children are involved in making decisions about their learning and daily activities.
What he talks about in his article is the contrast between unschooling and what the author describes as โfactory-styleโ schooling. Wheatley critiques standardised testing. He critiques accelerated curriculum. He also critiques limited play opportunities and rigid schedules. Wheatley suggests that these practices can negatively affect motivation and healthy development. Instead, the article presents unschooling as an alternative model that values autonomy, curiosity, meaningful learning, and intrinsic motivation.
This is not new. There has been a lot of criticism of one size fits all model. E.g. by Ken Robinson or Ilyich.
Although the article strongly advocates for unschooling, it is largely theoretical and reflective in nature rather than empirical research. Much of the discussion relies on personal experience. It draws from educational philosophy and references to motivational psychology literature. This is rather than focusing on large-scale data studies.
As edivence-based teacher, I would love to research more about the lack of structure for learning from a neuroscientific point of view.
Reference
Wheatley, K. F. (2009). Unschooling: A growing oasis for development and democracy. Encounter: Education for Meaning and Social Justice, 22(2), 27-32.
LET’S DISCUSS!
https://www.facebook.com/Storykate2020
Have you heard this term before?
Have you heard parents talk about unschooling?
Or are you doing a version of unschooling in your own family?
Iโd love to hear your thoughts in the comments.
I thought we had exhausted every possible game with Dienes blocks. Turns out we had barely scratched the surface.
Dienes blocks are a very flexible tool for developing a childโs thinking. To me, itโs hard to find another toy with this kind of range. We thought we had played every possible game and hit a creative wall. However, there were dozens more ideas we hadnโt tried yet.
Move into the house
For this game, youโll need a set of Dienes blocks, paper, and markers. Draw a house with two rooms. In one room live all the small shapes, in the other all the large ones. Make sure you show the size with simple symbols.
You can also sort the house by colour. In the red room live all the red shapes, in the yellow room the yellow ones, and so on.

Once your child is comfortable with a single-storey house, move on to a two-storey house. On the first floor (show them clearly) live the small blocks, on the second all the big ones. In the first entrance live the yellow shapes, in the second the blue, in the third the red.
And then you can build a three-storey house. Three floors, four entrances. Help each โresidentโ find their room.
Find the way out of the forest
For this game, youโll need markers, a large sheet of paper such as A3, and your Dienes blocks. Draw a forest, with a clearing in the centre, and paths leading out in different directions. On each path, draw colour symbols (yellow, blue, red).

Let your child help the blocks (or little piglets, if you like) find their way out of the forest. Explain that, for example, blue ones can only travel along the path marked with blue.
Now add a โnotโ sign by crossing out the blue circle. When your child tries to take a blue block along that path, explain that it canโt go there. That path is not for blue. But it is open to anything that is not blue. Try sending red and yellow blocks along it.
Once they get the idea, you can add more featuresโbig and small, thick and thin, different shapes. You can also add more paths to make the challenge richer.
Good luck!
Get Dienes blocks here
Watch my video about attribute blocks
When I was pregnant, for some reason, I just knew who I was going to have. The ultrasound confirmed it: a boy. Over time, our home filled up with toy cars. We collected building sets and toy guns. We also gathered a whole bag of little mates. Child psychologist Kathy Walker says raising boys is a special kind of art. I still agree, but now I would add that it is also a practice that asks for reflection.
The old debate about what comes first in child development, genes or upbringing, is still going. What has shifted is how we understand that relationship. Research now clearly points to an interaction between the two. As Lise Eliot explains in Pink Brain, Blue Brain, the differences we see early in life are often small. They are quickly shaped by experience, relationships, and expectations.

So yes, biology matters. But it does not write the whole story.
There are some patterns we see again and again. Boys, on average, tend to be more physically active. Studies of infants already show slightly higher activity levels in boys. They often gravitate towards movement, rough and tumble play, and toys that involve building or motion. Research by Simon Baron-Cohen has explored these early preferences.
I have seen this myself. I still remember my friend and I trying to separate two toddlers. They were one and a half years old and happily wrestling each other. With love, of course.
But this is where I would pause now in a way I did not before.
Because alongside these patterns sits another body of research that reminds us to be careful. Janet Hyde, through the Gender Similarities Hypothesis, shows that most psychological differences between boys and girls are actually small. There is often more variation within each group than between them.
In other words, not all boys are the same. Not even close.
Here is shy and introverted Lauchlan, who prefers to play alone; Bries who likes dinosaurs and is very sensitive; Maksim who is very confident and is a leader; while Matt prefers to play with the dolls.
And then there is the environment.
It is hard to ignore how strongly culture shapes what we expect from boys. From a very early age, boys are often nudged, sometimes gently, sometimes not, towards a narrow version of masculinity. Be strong. Do not cry. Do not be like a girl.
If a boy reaches for dolls, they are often replaced with cars. If he prefers quieter play or the company of girls, adults may try to redirect him towards sport or competition. Without even noticing, we start to close some doors while opening others.
Researchers like Cordelia Fine argue that many of the differences we take for granted are shaped and reinforced by these everyday interactions. Not imposed in one moment, but built slowly over time.
One area where the research feels especially important is emotional development.
Work by Judy Y. Chu and Niobe Way shows that young boys are often emotionally open, expressive, and deeply relational. But as they grow, many learn to pull back. Not because they lack feeling, but because they learn what is acceptable.
That old message, do not cry, carries further than we might think.
So when we talk about raising boys now, the question shifts slightly. It is less about what boys are like, and more about what we allow them to be.
Yes, boys may need space to move, to explore, to take risks. I watched a group of preschoolers during bush preschool session running around, exploring the terrain and noticed NO behaviour issues. That still holds. Running, climbing, testing limits, all of this matters. But just as much, they need space to feel, to connect, to be unsure, to be gentle.
Research does not tell us to treat boys and girls as the same. It tells us to stay attentive to the child in front of us, rather than the category we place them in.
Some practical ideas still make sense, and I hold onto them:

And one that matters more to me now than before:
At home, this also means something quite practical. Shared responsibility. My son has helped around the house since he was little. Washing dishes, clearing the table, taking the bins out. Not as a lesson in discipline, but as a way of saying, we live here together, we take care of this place together.
No special rules for boys. Just shared life.
And one more thing.
I am still very happy to be a boy mum. That has not changed. If anything, it has deepened. Growing alongside him is still full of movement, noise, and laughter. But now it also comes with more questions. There is more attention to the small moments. Something opens or quietly closes.
Because of him, I have spent time rollerblading and skateboarding, jumping on trampolines, snowboarding, and even trying surfing.
And now, I also find myself noticing different things. When he holds back. When he speaks up. When he shows care.
What is your experience like?

Wisdom from the theorists who shaped early childhood education
Man is born free, and everywhere he is in chains.
Play is the highest expression of human development in childhood, for it alone is the free expression of what is in a child’s soul.
Receive the children in reverence, educate them in love, and send them forth in freedom.
Never help a child with a task at which he feels he can succeed.
Play is the answer to how anything new comes about.
Every child needs at least one adult who is irrationally crazy about him or her.
Attachment theory provides a framework for understanding the nature of emotional bonds between people, particularly between children and their caregivers. It emphasises the importance of secure attachments in promoting healthy development and emotional wellbeing throughout life.
What a child can do with assistance today she will be able to do by herself tomorrow.
In the course of his movement development, the infant learns not only to turn, roll, crawl, sit, stand or walk — but he also learns to learn. He learns to occupy himself independently, to find interest in something, to try, to experiment, to overcome difficulties.
We are spinners of meaning, not passive receivers of information.
The only person who is educated is the one who has learned how to learn and change.
The goal of education is not to increase the amount of knowledge but to create the possibilities for a child to invent and discover — to create people who are capable of doing new things.
Every time we teach a child something, we keep them from inventing it themselves. That which we allow them to discover for themselves will remain with them for the rest of their life.
The child has a hundred languages, a hundred hands, a hundred thoughts, a hundred ways of thinking, of playing, of speaking.
Creativity becomes more visible when adults try to be more attentive to the cognitive processes of children than to the results they achieve in various fields of doing and understanding.
The child is not a citizen of the future; they are a citizen from the very first moment of life — a bearer, here and now, of rights, of values, of culture.
To listen is to give value, to attribute importance to the other person. It means recognising their right to speak and to be heard.
Education either functions as an instrument to bring about conformity or it becomes the practice of freedom — the means by which people deal critically and creatively with reality and discover how to transform their world.
Whoever teaches learns in the act of teaching, and whoever learns teaches in the act of learning.
Pedagogy is not about training — it is about critically educating people to be self-reflective, capable of analysing the world around them.
Children have fewer rights than almost any other group and fewer institutions protecting these rights. Their voices and needs are almost completely absent from the debates and policies constructed in their name.
There is no power relation without the correlative constitution of a field of knowledge, nor any knowledge that does not presuppose and constitute at the same time power relations.
The Enlightenment, which discovered the liberties, also invented the disciplines.
If a pupil finds it difficult, it is not the pupil’s fault but the teacher’s. The teacher must find the method that makes it easy.
Children are the living messages we send to a time we will not see.