Yesterday, I overheard a conversation between a parent and an educator. The parent casually said, โOh, weโre doing a little bit of unschooling.โ

I paused for a second because it was the first time I had heard that term. Naturally, I asked a few more questions.
UNSCHOOLING
It turns out that unschooling is an educational approach in which children learn through their own interests, curiosity, and everyday experiences rather than pursuing a fixed curriculum or formal lessons. Instead of adults deciding exactly what and when children should learn, the childโs interests help guide the learning process.
For example, a child interested in cooking might naturally explore maths through measuring ingredients. They can develop literacy through reading recipes. They may also learn science through experimenting with food.
I found the conversation really interesting because the idea of self-directed learning is becoming more visible in conversations about education and childhood.
RESEARCH
Wheatley (2009) describes unschooling as a child-led approach to education. Learning develops naturally through childrenโs interests, play, and curiosity. It is also nurtured by everyday experiences instead of a formal curriculum. This approach avoids tests or teacher-directed instruction. The article argues that children are naturally motivated to learn when their emotional and developmental needs are met. Wheatley draws on theories of intrinsic motivation and self-determination. He suggests that traditional schooling can undermine childrenโs love of learning. This happens when schools rely too heavily on control, standardisation, and external rewards.
The article highlights several perceived benefits of unschooling. These benefits include greater individualisation of learning. There are more opportunities for creativity and initiative. The approach allows flexible use of time. It also offers stronger support for the “whole child,” including social, emotional, and physical wellbeing. Wheatley also argues that unschooling encourages democratic participation. Children are involved in making decisions about their learning and daily activities.
What he talks about in his article is the contrast between unschooling and what the author describes as โfactory-styleโ schooling. Wheatley critiques standardised testing. He critiques accelerated curriculum. He also critiques limited play opportunities and rigid schedules. Wheatley suggests that these practices can negatively affect motivation and healthy development. Instead, the article presents unschooling as an alternative model that values autonomy, curiosity, meaningful learning, and intrinsic motivation.
This is not new. There has been a lot of criticism of one size fits all model. E.g. by Ken Robinson or Ilyich.
Although the article strongly advocates for unschooling, it is largely theoretical and reflective in nature rather than empirical research. Much of the discussion relies on personal experience. It draws from educational philosophy and references to motivational psychology literature. This is rather than focusing on large-scale data studies.
As edivence-based teacher, I would love to research more about the lack of structure for learning from a neuroscientific point of view.
Reference
Wheatley, K. F. (2009). Unschooling: A growing oasis for development and democracy. Encounter: Education for Meaning and Social Justice, 22(2), 27-32.
LET’S DISCUSS!
https://www.facebook.com/Storykate2020
Have you heard this term before?
Have you heard parents talk about unschooling?
Or are you doing a version of unschooling in your own family?
Iโd love to hear your thoughts in the comments.







