Higher-Order Thinking Skills in Early Childhood: Insights for Early Childhood Educators and Teachers

“Kate, why do some bubbles pop quickly and others don’t?”

Noah’s question popped up during a morning of science fun at the early learning centre. Children were busy making bubbles—some floated peacefully before bursting, while others seemed to pop almost instantly. I used a secret ingredient – sugar to make one solution more sturdy. Instead of giving Noah a straight answer, I saw this as a perfect opportunity to spark some higher-order thinking and critical thinking in our preschoolers. So, I turned to Noah and the group and asked, “What do you all think? Why do you reckon some bubbles last longer than others?”

This simple question opened up a whole new world of questions, where children and I started to hypothesise, observe, and chat about their ideas—exactly the kind of thinking we want to encourage in our little learners. As Vygotsky intended 🙂


Introduction to Higher-Order Thinking and Critical Thinking in Preschool

Higher-order thinking skills (HOTS) are so important when it comes to helping young minds grow, especially in early childhood. These skills go way beyond just remembering things; they’re all about analysing, reasoning, solving problems, and thinking creatively. In Australian ELCs, we’re all about fostering these abilities, which line up perfectly with the Early Years Learning Framework (EYLF). The EYLF encourages holistic development through play-based learning—something we know works wonders with young children. It also has the whole outcome 4 dedicated to learning and thinking.

Critical thinking in preschool is about helping kids think deeply about what they’re learning, ask questions, and connect ideas. By nurturing critical thinking early on, we set them up for success in problem-solving and decision-making down the track. Moments like Noah’s bubble question aren’t just cute—they’re golden opportunities to guide the children into deeper thinking and understanding.

Understanding Vygotsky’s concept of Higher-Order Thinking

Lev Vygotsky’s theory has had a huge impact on how we approach early childhood education. He highlighted the importance of social and cultural interactions in cognitive development. Vygotsky believed that children learn best when they interact with others, especially when these interactions push them just beyond what they can already do—a concept he called the Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD).

In Noah’s bubble experiment, Vygotsky’s ideas are evident. By asking the children what they thought made some bubbles last longer than others, I wasn’t just starting a conversation—I was guiding them into their ZPD, encouraging them to think critically and explore science in a hands-on, fun way. Things they do not yet know, but definitely can learn through more experiences and discussions.

How to Ask Higher-Order Thinking and Critical Thinking Questions in an Early Childhood Setting

Getting children to engage in higher-order and critical thinking is all about asking the right questions. In Noah’s case, rather than just explaining why some bubbles pop faster, I turned the question back to the group. This invited everyone to think, hypothesise, and explore—a much richer learning experience.

Here’s how you can do the same in your classroom:

  1. Encourage children to think beyond yes-or-no answers. Instead of asking, “Will the colours mix?” try, “What do you think will happen if we mix these two colours?”
  2. Questions like “Why do you think that happened?” get kids to reflect on their experiences and think about cause and effect.
  3. Ask questions that spark creative thinking, such as “What if the bubbles were different shapes? What do you think would happen?”
  4. Challenge children with real-world problems like, “How can we make sure the bubbles don’t pop too quickly next time?” This gets them thinking about solutions and strategies.

Incorporating these types of questions into your daily activities can help children develop the critical thinking skills that are key to their cognitive development.

Assessing Higher-Order Thinking and Critical Thinking Skills in ELC

When it comes to assessing higher-order and critical thinking in young children, it’s all about observations and interactions. After Noah’s bubble experiment, for instance, I’d watch how the children discussed their ideas, tried different ways of blowing bubbles, and thought about what they observed. These interactions give us a window into their developing thinking skills. I will document it in the mind map or use floor books; write it as jottings.

The Role of Language in Developing Higher-Order Thinking and Critical Thinking in Early Childhood

Language plays a big role in helping kids develop higher-order and critical thinking skills. When I asked Noah to explain his thoughts about the bubbles, I encouraged him to organise his ideas, think through his reasoning, and explore new concepts—all of which are key to cognitive growth. Activities that get children talking, telling stories, or describing what they see are great for deepening their understanding and boosting their thinking skills. According to Vygotsky, language and thought are parallel processes that develop in the child’s mind simultaneously. Language propels thinking tenfold.

Higher-Order and Critical Thinking Skills in Play-Based Learning

Play is at the heart of early childhood education, and it’s also a fantastic way to develop higher-order and critical thinking skills. Through play, children naturally engage in activities that require them to experiment, hypothesise, and solve problems. For example, when children build a tall tower with blocks, they’re learning about balance, cause and effect, and spatial relationships. As educators, we can scaffold this learning by asking questions like, “What can we do to make the tower stronger?”

The Role of Scaffolding in Developing Higher-Order and Critical Thinking in Early Childhood

Scaffolding is essential in early childhood education, especially when it comes to developing higher-order and critical thinking skills. In a kindergarten setting, scaffolding means providing just enough support to help children achieve tasks within their ZPD. As they become more confident and capable, we gradually reduce this support, letting them take on more of the learning themselves.

This is an example of scaffolding based on counting

For example, during a tricky puzzle activity, I might start by suggesting which pieces might fit together based on shape or colour. As the child gains confidence, I’d step back, allowing them to explore independently and build their problem-solving and critical-thinking skills.

What do you think about HOTS now?


References

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Why do we need intentional teaching in early childhood education and care?

Do you know how Storykate is a big fan of socio-cultural theory by Lev Vygotsky?

I’ll give you an example of why I believe that scaffolding and teaching cultural tools are important in my philosophy as well.

I like Vygotsky not because he was a Soviet psychologist but because he provided us with his framework that still works, so according to social-cultural theory, social interaction and cultural transmission are important sources of knowledge.

When I was at university, we were given an example of how young street vendors in Brazil learn to count really well while selling goods, and these children did not go to school.

Is it a proposition not to go to school?

Does it mean that mathematical skills can be learned through observations or practice? Yes, and no!👩‍🎓

Hear me out!

The researchers were quite interested in the skills of the street vendors; they could easily perform simple arithmetic with 98% accuracy while buying and selling, including 2 and 3-digit numbers. They did addition and subtraction fast and well. When they were asked to write it down or understand arithmetic with mathematical notation, in other words, written down, they didn’t fail exactly, but their accuracy dropped to 37%. I like this example! Australian school children can perform the following two problems, and solve them. A boy wants to buy three chocolates that cost 50 coins each. How much money does he need? And the second problem is, ‘Another boy wants to buy 50 chocolates, this costs three coins each. How much money does he need?’

You can replace coins with cents or whatever currency you are using; if you think about it, it’s just a very simple problem from the point of an adult learner.

School children solve the problems with multiplication: 3×50 and were able to solve the second problem really well because they knew and understood that 3×50 = 50×3; they knew equations. In contrast, the children from the streets, the young street vendors from Brazil, were not able to use this fast method, so they used addition in both cases.

It means that teaching explicitly through scaffolding is what we have teachers for, including preschool teachers. Teachers help to move fast, solve problems more effectively, and learn cultural tools through interaction. Children at school learn how to do the equations and how to do multiplication because they went to school. Children should talk about how they solve the problem because they learn by reasoning. According to Vygotsky, the teacher also scaffolds this type of learning by modelling, providing prompts, and practicing. What about vendors? They learn it through practice, which is a wonderful way to learn as well, according to modern scientists like Marilyn Fleer, who is also a supporter of social-cultural theory. Concepts can be better introduced even at the preschool level if you are intentional.

Scaffolding is an important teaching strategy and we MUST use it in addition to play or self-paced learning.

WHAT DO YOU THINK, EDUCATORS?